How does the Darden Test determine if someone is an employee or contractor in the USA?

Correctly classifying workers as employees or independent contractors is essential for complying with employment laws, tax regulations, and benefit eligibility. One legal framework used to determine a worker's status is the Darden Test.

What Is the Darden Test?

The Darden Test stems from the 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden. It provides a legal standard based on common law agency principles to assess whether a worker should be considered an employee or an independent contractor, particularly in federal employment law contexts (like Title VII discrimination cases).

Key Factors in the Darden Test

The Darden Test evaluates the nature of the relationship between the hiring party and the worker. No single factor is decisive; instead, courts look at the totality of the circumstances. Here are the primary factors considered:

Control: Does the hiring party control how and when the work is done?
Skill required: Is the work highly specialized or routine?
Tools and equipment: Who provides the tools or equipment used?
Work location: Where is the work performed?
Length of relationship: Is the relationship ongoing or for a specific project?
Additional projects: Can the hiring party assign other work?
Work schedule: Does the worker decide their own hours?
Payment method: Is the worker paid per job or on a regular schedule (e.g., hourly, salaried)?
Hiring assistants: Can the worker hire and pay others to help?
Business integration: Is the work a regular part of the hiring party's business?
Business existence: Is the hiring party engaged in business themselves?
Employee benefits: Are benefits like health insurance or retirement plans offered?
Tax treatment: Are taxes withheld, or is the worker responsible for self-employment tax?

Interpreting the Answers: What Does "Yes" Mean?

Here’s a helpful way to think about how the answers to these questions influence classification:

If you answer "Yes", it typically leans toward:

Question / Factor	"Yes" Suggests
Does the hiring party control how and when the work is done?	Employee
Is the work done using tools/equipment provided by the company?	Employee
Is the work location determined by the hiring party?	Employee
Is the relationship ongoing, not tied to a specific project?	Employee
Can the hiring party assign additional tasks?	Employee
Does the hiring party provide benefits (e.g., health insurance)?	Employee
Are taxes withheld from paychecks?	Employee
Is the worker paid hourly/salaried on a regular basis?	Employee
Is the work a core part of the hiring party's business?	Employee

Question / Factor	"Yes" Suggests
Does the worker decide their own schedule and work hours?	Contractor
Does the worker use their own tools and equipment?	Contractor
Is the work highly specialized or project-based?	Contractor
Can the worker refuse additional projects?	Contractor
Does the worker pay their own taxes and issue invoices?	Contractor
Can the worker hire and pay their own assistants?	Contractor
Is the worker engaged in their own independent business?	Contractor

Note: No single answer determines status — the overall relationship matters most.

Why It Matters

Misclassifying a worker can lead to:

Legal liability under employment laws
Back taxes and penalties from the IRS or state agencies
Denial of benefits to workers who may actually qualify

The Darden Test is especially relevant in court cases involving federal employee rights, but its principles are widely referenced when determining worker status.

How It Compares

Other classification tests exist, including:

The IRS Common Law Test (focuses heavily on control)
The ABC Test (used in some states for wage and labor law)
The Economic Realities Test (used under the Fair Labor Standards Act)

Each test applies in different legal contexts, but all aim to ensure that workers receive appropriate protections and benefits based on their working relationship.

In this article...

United States of America